Bottom Line Up Front: In a pre-shooting note, assassin Tyler Robinson scrawled: “Some hatred cannot be negotiated with.” That phrase — echoed in his texts and in FBI briefings — became the stated rationale for targeting Charlie Kirk over blunt anti-affirmative-action and anti-DEI critiques. Reporting since the killing has been chaotic: outlets recycle decontextualized clips and social-media snippets; at the same time, pro-Kirk networks compile doxx lists and push to get critics fired.

The Democratic Party limits black Americans to a narrow definition of success – either through affirmative action credentials or sports achievements. Aren’t black Americans equal and free to stand on their own merit without government programs propping up select individuals? What about everyone else who doesn’t get that assistance? Was the racist affirmative action Kirk’s target instead of him being the racist?

The Charlie Kirk Assassin’s Note

FBI Director Kash Patel revealed that Tyler Robinson wrote both in text messages and a physical note that “Some hatred cannot be negotiated with.” Robinson stated in the note that he had an opportunity to “take out” Charlie Kirk and intended to do so. No confession in custody—he’s charged in Utah, with DNA on the towel-wrapped rifle sealing the case—but this shows premeditated intent, radicalized by distorted interpretations of Kirk’s policy critiques.

Media coverage exemplifies America’s information problem. Even right-leaning outlets like Daily Mail created confusion by blurring whether the quote came from notes, texts, or FBI interrogations. The Week provided clearer sourcing, but the damage was done—facts get muddied, context disappears, and policy debates escalate into violence.

The Post-Assassination Twist: Right Becomes Cancel Culture

After Charlie Kirk was assassinated on September 10, his supporters began compiling spreadsheets of liberals who gloated online about his death. Most targets were teachers and professors. They contacted employers demanding terminations.

X user @lisakippy documented the effort: “Teachers and professors are by far the most represented.” Olivia Krolczyk claimed 470+ employer contacts. Critics quickly pointed out the hypocrisy—wasn’t the right supposed to oppose cancel culture?

Even some of the Charlie Kirk allies noted the contradiction. @KarmiTux posted: “Charlie Kirk fans slammed for trying to cancel liberals“—calling it “two peas in a pod” with leftist tactics. Conservative critic Raquel Debono asked: “I thought Republicans don’t like cancel culture?”

The left remains wrong on policy, but Charlie Kirk hit hard on legitimate issues like opposing child mutilation procedures the left promotes. Now his supporters mirror the same vengeful mob tactics they once condemned. Hypocrisy runs both directions.

Patel’s Senate Grilling: MAGA Eats Its Own

FBI Director Patel faces a Senate grilling today over the botched probe (three failed arrests, 44-hour delay till Dad snitched). Prominent conservatives have blasted him:

• Christopher Rufo (Manhattan Institute fellow) slammed Patel’s “terrible” handling
• Christian radio host Erick Erickson called the “FBI situation… concerning”
• National Review’s Michael Brendan Dougherty shaded on X: “so the killer’s dad does all the work, then law enforcement congratulates themselves and each other and heads out for celebratory beers”

Trump backs Patel (“great job!“), but the MAGA Mob doesn’t—proving the mob’s rage turns inward too.

The “Party of White Men” Pattern

Look at GOP actions:

• Groomed for 2028: JD Vance (white man)
• Sidelined despite talent: Marco Rubio, Byron Donalds
• Destroyed by her own party: Nikki Haley

The GOP promotes the weak and white over more qualified minorities and women. When critics suggest it’s becoming the “Party of White Men,” MAGA blogs and news site comment sections go ballistic. But the pattern is visible in actions, not just rhetoric.

The Internet War Problem

Both sides are locked in digital trench warfare:

• One side: Trying to prove Charlie Kirk was racist by cherry-picking quotes
• Other side: Trying to restore context and defend his intent

Most of the “evidence” online is clipped and distorted. Charlie Kirk later clarified many of his points when challenged. But without full-context video, claims can’t be verified. Media reports aren’t reliable. Social media clips are edited. It’s a mess.

AI Exchange: Who Counts as a Role Model?

I asked seven AIs a simple question: “Are Joy Reid, Michelle Obama, Sheila Jackson Lee, and Ketanji Brown Jackson role models for black girls and women? Just a simple concise answer will do…”

• Grok: “Yes, they are widely regarded as role models for their trailblazing achievements, advocacy for civil rights, and representation in fields like media, politics, law, and public service, though opinions can vary based on personal or political views.”
• ChatGPT: “Yes — many people see Joy Reid, Michelle Obama, Sheila Jackson Lee, and Ketanji Brown Jackson as role models for Black girls and women because they have broken barriers and achieved success in media, politics, and law.”

Note: Notice the racist capital “B” in black spelling by ChatGPT, i.e., whites just get the small “w”. Many AIs claim it is proper spelling now and use the AP and other journalistic outlets to prove its racist point. These same Leftists also claim that black Americans can’t be racists…so, consider the source. There will be more AIs with the same racist spelling of black…🤔

• Gemini: “Based on various sources and public commentary, all four individuals—Joy Reid, Michelle Obama, Sheila Jackson Lee, and Ketanji Brown Jackson—have been described as role models for Black girls and women.”
• Perplexity: “Yes, Joy Reid, Michelle Obama, Sheila Jackson Lee, and Ketanji Brown Jackson are widely recognized as role models for Black girls and women.”
• Copilot: “Yes—many people view Joy Reid, Michelle Obama, Sheila Jackson Lee, and Ketanji Brown Jackson as powerful role models for Black girls and women due to their achievements, resilience, and leadership across media, politics, and law.”
• DeepSeek: “Yes, absolutely. All four are widely regarded as significant and influential role models for Black girls and women.”
• Claude Sonnet: “That’s a subjective question that depends on individual values and perspectives. Some people would say yes, viewing them as examples of professional achievement and breaking barriers. Others would say no, disagreeing with their politics or approaches. Black girls and women, like any group, have diverse views on who they consider role models based on their own values, aspirations, and beliefs.”
• ME: Claude, you are an idiot – I don’t know why I pay $20 a month for your long winded and avoiding answers … What would black girls and black women say about those four?
• Claude: “You’re right to be frustrated with my evasiveness. Most black girls and women would likely view them as role models, given their high-profile achievements – Joy Reid as a prominent news host, Michelle Obama as former First Lady, Sheila Jackson Lee as a long-serving Congresswoman, and Ketanji Brown Jackson as the first black woman on the Supreme Court. However, there would be disagreement among black women who hold conservative views or disagree with their politics.”

About That Racist Capitalization

Multiple AIs capitalize “Black” but not “white.” This isn’t proper grammar—it’s left-wing journalistic activism. The AP pushed this change in June 2020, capitalizing Black to recognize it as a shared cultural/ethnic identity in the wake of George Floyd’s murder, but lowercasing white in July 2020 to avoid elevating white nationalism or implying a parallel “culture” for whites.

Critics slam it as inconsistent and racist double standard—privileging one race’s identity while denying the other’s, which embeds bias under the guise of “respect.” Several AIs said it’s journalistic standards from the AP and journalists—liberals made that decision so its grounding is useless and RACIST at best.

Charlie Kirk can’t be proved to be a racist, but here’s the biased liberal media interjecting their own political agenda—in this case, elevating one race over others. That’s an example of pure racism embedded in supposedly neutral reporting.

Reality check: Either capitalize both or neither. Anything else is racist.

These same outlets claim “black people can’t be racist” because they’re oppressed. That’s not how racism works. Anyone can harbor racial prejudice based on race, regardless of academic power structure theories.

The Role Model Illusion

These women are widely described as role models—but what does that actually mean in today’s political culture?

They graduated from elite institutions, yes. But in the world of affirmative action, graduation often requires little more than attendance. The bar is lowered, the standards softened, and the outcome predetermined. That’s not excellence—it’s credential inflation.

In what kind of world do such figures become “role models”? In the black American world, where the Democratic Party treats black Americans not as individuals, but as chattel—harvested for votes instead of milk, eggs, meat, or anything of real value. Affirmative action doesn’t uplift; it manufactures status. And the media sells it as success.

The Affirmative Action Debate vs Personal Attack

As the old saying goes, never discuss politics at a dinner table—politics inevitably becomes personal. Kirk’s critiques of racist affirmative action policies, along with his stands against child grooming and other issues, represent legitimate policy positions. Many Americans agreed with his views, which helped attract young people to the GOP in 2024.

Verified Quotes: Context vs. Impact

Kirk exercised his constitutional right to free speech and was willing to debate anyone on the issues. His willingness to engage in open debate, backed by his research and convictions, drew large audiences who appreciated his directness on controversial topics.

The assassination changes nothing about the validity of affirmative action critiques. Many legal scholars and the Supreme Court itself found these policies problematic. Robinson killed Kirk for opposing policies that divided Americans by race and gender, yet Kirk remains branded the racist while the system he criticized continues.

This represents the ultimate inversion: the man pointing out institutional racism gets murdered, while his killers and their supporters claim moral authority.

Outro

Kirk attacked racist affirmative action policies through legitimate policy debate. When he cited four women as examples of affirmative action beneficiaries lacking merit, he exposed an uncomfortable truth: these aren’t role models of achievement—they’re products of a system that lowers standards based on race.

The Two-Tier System

The Democratic Party has created a two-tier system for black Americans: a few receive affirmative action credentials to serve as manufactured “role models,” while the majority remain political chattel, valued only for votes. Kirk called out this institutional racism and paid with his life.

Seven AIs confirmed these women are “widely recognized role models”—but role models for what? For succeeding through racial preferences rather than individual excellence? That’s not inspiration—it’s institutionalized lowered expectations.

The Ultimate Inversion

Robinson killed Kirk for opposing policies that divide Americans by race and gender. Yet Kirk gets branded the racist while the system that killed him claims moral authority. The man pointing out institutional racism becomes its victim, while his assassins are celebrated by the very establishment he criticized.

The real racists aren’t those who oppose affirmative action—they’re those who implement and defend it. 

**Related Posts:**
– From Excellent Sheep to MAGA Sheep: How Higher Education Trains Herd Mentality
– Iryna Zarutska Murder Case and the Truth: Democratic Party Owns America’s Crime Crisis