‘Reports of the demise of the Democrat Party: are they premature or not?’ Guess this is sorta like a Part 2 of this previous post here: Democrats & Republicans = ‘Two Peas in the same Pod’. Will even use the main pic again.

Both “Peas” are convinced they’ve got killer messages—while simultaneously dismissing the other’s as “stale.” Both spend endless energy pointing fingers at each other’s flaws, yet after every election win, they strut around claiming a “mandate.” Trump, of course, called his “massive”—though exaggeration’s kinda his thing.

Let’s look at the scoreboard since 1961:

D – John F. Kennedy. D – Lyndon B. Johnson. R – Richard Nixon. R – Gerald Ford. D – Jimmy Carter. R – Ronald Reagan. R – George H. W. Bush. D – Bill Clinton. R – George W. Bush. D – Barack Obama. R – Donald Trump. D – Joe Biden. R – Donald Trump.

‘Whiplash’ Presidencies of “mandates” … so to speak of 6 Democrat Presidents, and 6 Republican Presidents since 1961.

64 years of back and forth. Why? They didn’t do a good enough job for the People, IMHO. George H. W. Bush may have been the best of the lot—got in a War, won it, and got out.

Trump lost me with his aiding Russia outta their dire straits. Is he America’s first President to aid our longtime enemy Russia against a country fighting for their freedom?

To answer neo’s question about reports of the “demise of the Democrat Party” being “premature or not”. The answer is simple: Extremely Premature.

Both parties are supporters of *BIG* Govt, with each wanting to install their own versions of what that *BIG* Govt will encompass, and each wanting to use the power of *BIG* Govt to cram those versions down the throats of others.

Neither party has the interests of the American People at heart, tho both falsely claim such, and The American People can see thru their ruses – hence the constant back and forth and/or the Pendulum’s swing of Presidencies…